Try it now!
Managing your investments has never been easier!
Most financial advisors charge about 1% of the assets they manage for you, every year. On a $500,000 portfolio that is roughly $5,000 a year — and because the fee is taken annually and compounds, a 1% charge can erode a large share of your long-term returns — on the order of a quarter of the ending balance over 30 years in a typical illustration. But 1% is the most common model, not the only one.
There are six common ways an advisor can charge you. What you should pay depends less on the size of your portfolio and more on how much ongoing, hands-on advice you actually need.
Advisor fees — sometimes called investment advisory fees — come in six main shapes. What you should pay depends less on your portfolio size than on how much ongoing, hands-on advice you actually need. Here is how the six models compare on a typical 2026 basis:
| Fee model | Typical 2026 cost | How you pay | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assets under management (AUM) | ~0.5%–1.5% per year (commonly ~1%) | A percentage of your whole balance, billed quarterly | Investors who want to fully delegate and value an ongoing relationship |
| Flat fee / annual retainer | $2,000–$10,000 per year | A fixed annual price, independent of portfolio size | Larger portfolios that want advice without the percentage drag |
| Hourly | $200–$400 per hour | Per hour, for one-off advice or a second opinion | Confident DIY investors who want occasional expert input |
| Commission / fee-based | Embedded in the products you buy | Loads and commissions inside funds, annuities or insurance | Rarely the investor — watch for a built-in conflict of interest |
| Robo-advisor | ~0.25% per year | A percentage of assets, for automated allocation and rebalancing | Simple, passive, long-horizon portfolios |
| AI advice tools | Flat subscription, or free | A subscription — not a percentage of assets, and no product commissions | Self-directed investors who want an independent second opinion |
↔ Scroll sideways to see every column
The default model. You pay a percentage of everything the advisor manages, usually billed quarterly. The rate typically slides down as your balance grows — perhaps 1% up to $1M and less above that — but most retail investors pay close to 1%.
Best for: people who want to fully delegate and value an ongoing relationship. Watch out for: the fee scales with your savings, not with the work involved, and it is charged every year whether or not your portfolio changes.
A fixed annual price for advice, decoupled from your portfolio size. On a large portfolio this is often far cheaper than 1% AUM; on a small one it can be more expensive.
Best for: larger portfolios that want real advice without the percentage drag. Watch out for: a high effective rate if your balance is modest.
You pay for time, like a lawyer or accountant — useful for a plan review, a single decision, or a second opinion.
Best for: confident DIY investors who want occasional expert input. Watch out for: no ongoing monitoring between sessions.
The advisor earns from the products you buy — mutual fund loads, annuities, insurance — so the "advice" can feel free because the cost is embedded in the product.
Best for: rarely the investor. Watch out for: a built-in conflict of interest. A commission-based or "fee-based" advisor is not necessarily a fiduciary and may not be required to put your interests first.
Software builds and rebalances a diversified portfolio for a fraction of a human advisor's fee — no planning conversation, but also no 1% bill.
Best for: simple, passive, long-horizon portfolios. Watch out for: limited help with taxes, estate, or talking you out of a panic-sell, and it is still a percentage fee.
A newer category: software that reads your actual holdings and flags risk, concentration, diversification gaps, and fee drag without taking custody of your money or charging a percentage of it. It does not replace a human advisor for complex personal situations, but it gives self-directed investors an independent second opinion — one that is not tied to selling a product or charging a percentage of your assets. This is the model 8FIGURES uses.
Fees matter so much because of compounding. A 1% annual fee does not just cost you 1% — it costs you 1% of a balance that would otherwise have kept growing, every year, for decades. Over a 30-year horizon a 1% AUM fee can reduce the ending balance by roughly 25% — a hypothetical illustration assuming about a 7% gross annual return, not a prediction; actual results vary. We walk through the full math in why your 1% advisor costs you 25% of your wealth.
Because AUM fees are charged as a percentage, the dollar cost climbs with your balance while a flat fee stays put. Here is the annual fee each model charges at different portfolio sizes — simple fee arithmetic (your balance times the fee rate), not an investment return or projection:
| Portfolio size | AUM at 1% | Flat fee (example $5,000) | Robo at 0.25% | AI tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $100,000 | $1,000 | $5,000 | $250 | Flat subscription |
| $250,000 | $2,500 | $5,000 | $625 | Flat subscription |
| $500,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 | $1,250 | Flat subscription |
| $1,000,000 | $10,000 | $5,000 | $2,500 | Flat subscription |
| $2,000,000 | $20,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 | Flat subscription |
↔ Scroll sideways to see every column
The pattern is the point: because AUM is charged as a percentage, its dollar cost keeps climbing as your balance grows, while a flat fee stays fixed regardless of size. Robo-advisors and AI tools are priced on a different basis again — a smaller percentage, or a flat subscription rather than a percentage of your assets. AI tools in particular are read-only software: they do not manage money, take custody, or make trades, so they are an independent second opinion rather than a like-for-like replacement for a full-service advisor. These are annual fee amounts only — the true long-run cost is larger because each year’s fee also gives up the growth that money would have earned, which is why a 1% fee can cost far more than 1% over decades.
The labels sound similar and matter enormously:
If you want advice without an embedded conflict of interest, look for a fee-only fiduciary and confirm it in writing.
Sometimes clearly yes, sometimes clearly no.
Often worth it when: your situation is genuinely complex — business ownership, concentrated stock, estate or multi-generational planning, a large liquidity event — or when the advisor's real value is behavioral: keeping you invested through a crash you would otherwise panic-sell. A good advisor who prevents one bad decision can earn the fee back many times over.
Often not worth 1% when: your portfolio is straightforward, your balance is small enough that 1% is a heavy drag, and you are disciplined enough not to react to headlines. There, a flat-fee fiduciary for occasional check-ins, a low-cost robo, or an AI second opinion usually serves you better than perpetual AUM fees.
Before you hand over 1% a year, it is worth knowing exactly what is in your portfolio and what it is costing you. The 8FIGURES Portfolio Analyzer shows your real allocation, concentration, and fee drag across every linked account, and the 8FIGURES AI investment advisor gives guidance on a flat subscription — not a percentage of your assets, and earns no commissions on the products you hold. For a closer comparison, see AI portfolio management vs human advisors.
8FIGURES is an SEC-registered investment adviser. This article is general information, not personalized financial advice. Fee ranges are typical industry figures and vary by advisor, region, and services; confirm any advisor's fees and fiduciary status in writing, and consult a qualified professional about your own situation.
Managing your investments has never been easier!
